Celtic manager Brendan Rodgers has expressed significant dissatisfaction with a VAR decision that became a pivotal moment in their rare league defeat against Hibernian. The drama unfolded at Easter Road when what seemed to be a late equalizer by Daizen Maeda was annulled by VAR after originally being accepted by the on-field referee.
The controversy hinges on VAR official Alan Muir's call, which nullified the goal by claiming Alistair Johnston's cross had traveled out of bounds before Maeda made his move. Rodgers has been vocal about his concerns, questioning the adequacy of the camera angle that led to this decision. "There's no conclusive proof the ball was out," Rodgers stated, emphasizing that the angle from the 18-yard line provided was not capable of offering a definitive view.
Adding to the confusion, the assistant referee did not signal for offside or the ball going out, suggesting uncertainty about the ball's position. This lack of immediate flags further fueled Rodgers' argument that the initial judgment might have been prematurely overturned without solid evidence.
Referee Steven McLean backed VAR's assessment, contending that the decision was made because the ball was 'factually out.' However, this has not satisfied Rodgers, who insists that greater clarity and openness in decision-making processes are essential, especially when such significant outcomes are at stake.
In light of Rodgers' objections, the Scottish FA's Key Match Incidents Panel will review the situation in detail. VAR official Willie Collum is anticipated to participate in forthcoming discussions on a review show, where the incident will be dissected further.
Despite the contentious ruling and the resulting defeat, Celtic continues to lead the Scottish Premiership, holding a notable 13-point advantage over their competitors. This incident, however, has sparked broader discussions about the reliability and precision of VAR technology in critical match situations.
Write a comment